Cited by 0Race, Genetics, and SocietyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The ethno-racial basis of chronic diseases: Rethinking race and ethnicity from a critical epidemiological perspective

Calestani, Melania, Montesi, Laura·2020·Critical Medical Anthropology

Abstract

An engaging five-day workshop on critical medical anthropology organised by CIESAS and UCL was coming to an end. It was a sunny Friday in January and the Central Valleys of Oaxaca promised a spectacle of beauty and historical heritage to a group of anthropologists. We were about to visit Monte Albán, an archaeological site, testament to the Zapotec civilisation and its power over the region. We were still riding the wave of the workshop debates when we met our tourist guide. We introduced ourselves to him and when Laura said that she worked with diabetes patients, the guide observed that

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv13xprxf.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Calestani, M., & Montesi, L.
Venue
Critical Medical Anthropology
Publisher
UCL Press
Published
2020-03-12
Pages
170-192
OpenAlex
W4251708241
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
UCL Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
chronic disease, ethnicity, race, health disparities, social determinants of health, ethnic minorities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review