The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Projet JADE 2. ‘Object-signs’ and social interpretations of Alpine jade axeheads in the European Neolithic: theory and methodology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alpine jade axes circulated widely during the Neolithic, spanning from the Atlantic to the Black Sea.
“Alpine jade axes, sourced from Italian Alpine deposits circulated widely during the Neolithic, spanning from the Atlantic to the Black Sea (D'amico 2005, Pétrequin et al. 2013, Pétrequin et al. 2015).”
From Comparing Connectivity Patterns in Prehistoric Germany by Means of Network Analysis, Artefact and Site Distribution and a Reassessment of Human Mobility ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) (2026) · cites this paper as Pétrequin et al. 2015
Alpine jade axes were transported widely but deposited in socially charged settings according to ritualized logics rather than utilitarian routing.
“This accords with long-standing work showing that Alpine jade axes (Monte Viso and related sources) were transported widely but deposited in socially charged settings, rock shelters, boulder forecourts, watery locales, graves, hoards, according to ritualized logics rather than utilitarian routing (D'amico 2005, Pétrequin et al. 2013, Pétrequin et al. 2015).”
From Comparing Connectivity Patterns in Prehistoric Germany by Means of Network Analysis, Artefact and Site Distribution and a Reassessment of Human Mobility ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) (2026) · cites this paper as Pétrequin et al. 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schjerven, N., Bilotti, G., Kempf, M., & Reiter, S. S. (2026) · OPEN Archaeology · doi:10.1515/opar-2025-0077
Metadata
- Authors
- Pétrequin, P., Sheridan, A., Gauthier, E., Cassen, S., & Errera, M.
- Venue
- Connecting Networks: Characterising Contact by Measuring Lithic Exchange in the European Neolithic
- Publisher
- Archaeopress Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2015-07-31
- Pages
- 83-102
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
