Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Household to Neighborhood: Toward a Community-Oriented Archaeological Approach in the Plantation Chesapeake

BOROUGHS, JASON·2021·Historical Archaeology in the Twenty-First Century

Abstract

As Williamsburg became a prosperous urban center, African Americans interacted in dynamic rural plantation neighborhoods that enveloped the city and dominated the landscapes and waterways of colonial and antebellum Virginia. Neighbors, free and enslaved, laid deep ancestral and communal roots within mosaics of local places as they shared in labors and experiences, trials and exploits on grounds that reverberated with the comings and goings of successive generations. Starting from a recently excavated antebellum field quarter and post-Emancipation tenant residence adjacent to Colonial Williamsburg’s Historic Area, this essay asserts that in order to craft more nuanced archaeological interpretations that are based in similar domestic contexts, the types of associated places that typically defined life in plantation communities (places that became entwined with the lives and experiences of generations past and present) must be addressed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv21r3pmq.17

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
BOROUGHS, J.
Venue
Historical Archaeology in the Twenty-First Century
Published
2021-11-16
Pages
151-171
Cited by
1
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.