The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Citizenship and Education: The Case of the Black Deaf Community
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In 1983, a century after the establishment of the NAD, National Black Advocates for the Deaf (NBDA) was founded and continues today to foster solidarity among Black Deaf people across the nation (McCaskill et al., 2016).”
From “From White Deaf People’s Adversity to Black Deaf Gain”: A Proposal for a New Lens of Black Deaf Educational History (2020) · cites this paper as McCaskill et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“After the case of Miller et al. v. Board of Education of District of Columbia et al. was filed in 1952 (Jowers-Barber, 2008; McCaskill et al., 2016), deaf education was gradually desegregated, but this was not simultaneously effective throughout all schools.”
From “From White Deaf People’s Adversity to Black Deaf Gain”: A Proposal for a New Lens of Black Deaf Educational History (2020) · cites this paper as McCaskill et al., 2016
Citations
Cited by
Tsegay Moges, R. (2020) · JCSCORE · doi:10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2020.6.1.68-99 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- McCaskill, C., Lucas, C., Bayley, R., & Hill, J.
- ORCID
- Bayley, Robert
- Venue
- In Our Own Hands
- Publisher
- Gallaudet University Press
- Published
- 2016-05-30
- Pages
- 40-60
- OpenAlex
- W4291692532
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gallaudet University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Citizenship Education and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- citizenship, education, deaf education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
