The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law: Problem No. 1 (unpublished manuscript, 1958)
Abstract
Hart & Sacks' The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law provides detailed information on the making and application of law. The casebook provides the tools for fast, easy, on-point research. Part of the University Casebook Series; , it includes selected cases designed to illustrate the development of a body of law on a particular subject. Text and explanatory materials designed for law study accompany the cases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automatic construction against the insurer goes against contract law principles by removing the consideration of extrinsic evidence.
“Automatic construction against the insurer goes against contract law principles by removing the consideration of extrinsic evidence.”
From An analysis of interpretation of insurance contracts: common law versus strict contra proferentem (2023) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An analysis of interpretation of insurance contracts: common law versus strict contra proferentem
Cole, C., & Henry, R. (2023) · Journal of Insurance Regulation · doi:10.52227/23499.2017 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- HART, H. M., & SACKS, A. M.
- Venue
- The Canon of American Legal Thought
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2018-07-14
- Pages
- 241-310
- OpenAlex
- W1580351672
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 355.27
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
- Keywords
- legal procedure, application of law, legal developments, case law, legal reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
