The Early Pueblo Period: A Synthesis of Sorts
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is currently no independent archaeological evidence-such as ceramic patterning or biochemical data-that supports an influx of northern populations in the ninth century AD.
“There is, however, currently no independent archaeological evidence-such as ceramic patterning or biochemical data-that supports an influx of northern populations in the ninth century AD (see Kantner 2012;Price et al. 2017;Mills et al. 2018).”
From The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation (2018) · cites this paper as Kantner 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The complex history of Pueblo Bonito and its interpretation
Crown, P. L., & Wills, W. H. (2018) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.138 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kantner, J.
- Corresponding author
- Kantner, John
- ORCID
- Kantner, John
- Venue
- Crucible of Pueblos
- Published
- 2012-12-31
- Pages
- 223-233
- OpenAlex
- W2940315595
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Archaeology and Natural History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- Ancestral Puebloans, prehistoric archaeology, cliff dwellings, Ancestral Puebloan culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
