A Radiocarbon-based Chronology for the New Kingdom
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The chronology of Thutmose III and Thutmose IV is supported by radiocarbon dating, with accession years estimated in the range 1518-1501 BC and 1434-1420 BC respectively (95.4% probability).
“The chronology of these rulers is supported by radiocarbon dating, with accession years estimated in the range 1518–1501 BC and 1434–1420 BC respectively (95.4% probability) [2–4].”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Regional and growing radiocarbon offsets are small in magnitude, around one to two decades at most.
“How the regional and growing offsets varied through time is not yet well understood, but all evidence indicates they are small in magnitude, around one to two decades at most.”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [140]
The 14C-based Egyptian model puts Merneptah's accession at 1241-1219 BC (95.4% hpd) and Seti II at 1232-1209 (95.4% hpd).
“The 14C-based Egyptian model puts his accession at 1241–1219 BC (95.4% hpd) and that of Seti II at 1232–1209 (95.4% hpd).”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Webster, L. C., Wolff, S. R., Ortiz, S. M., Barbosa, M., Coyle, C., Arbino, G. P., Dee, M. W., Hua, Q., & Jacobsen, G. E. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293119 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Dee, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dee, M. W.
- ORCID
- Dee, M. W.
- Venue
- Radiocarbon and the Chronologies of Ancient Egypt
- Publisher
- Oxbow Books
- Published
- 2013-05-31
- Pages
- 65-75
- OpenAlex
- W2945123027
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 13.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxbow Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- radiocarbon chronology, New Kingdom, ancient Egypt, Egyptian chronology, archaeological site dating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
