Radiocarbon Calibration in the Mid to Later 14th Century BC and Radiocarbon Dating Tell el-Amarna, Egypt
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A model combining available 14C dates and historical constraints indicates a maximum possible offset around the time of the burial of Tutankhamun of ~19 14C years versus IntCal20.
“A model combining the available 14C dates and the historical constraints7, 33,50 (Supplementary Table S3) indicates a maximum possible offset around the time of the burial of Tutankhamun of ~ 19 14C years versus IntCal20 (Fig. 4b).”
From Radiocarbon offsets and old world chronology as relevant to Mesopotamia, Egypt, Anatolia and Thera (Santorini) (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
For Egypt, an offset allowance of 19 ± 5 14C years was proposed and appears necessary to achieve plausible protohistoric dates.
“The partial exception is Egypt, where an offset allowance of 19 ± 5 14C years was proposed (16, 23) and appears necessary to achieve plausible protohistoric dates (23, 24).”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Mainstream assessments of historical sources place the time range for the accession of Tutankhamun and his death likely in his 9th or 10th year, somewhere between ~1336/1325 and 1327/1316 BCE.
“Mainstream assessments of historical sources place the time range for the accession of Tutankhamun (the king and his court subsequently leave Amarna for Memphis early in his reign) and his death likely in his 9th or 10th year, somewhere between ~1336/1325 and 1327/1316 BCE (23, 24, 49).”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
Rerunning the Tutankhamun data set analysis against IntCal13 and comparing against IntCal04 and Hd GOR shows a likely best fit versus the Hd GOR range.
“The placement of the Tutankhamun data set rerunning the analysis in (24) against IntCal13 and comparing against IntCal04 and Hd GOR similarly shows a likely best fit versus the Hd GOR range (Fig. 4A, inset).”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
For the time range of this study, Hd GeO values compare well with previous Seattle LLGPC measurements on GeO 1700 to 1500 BCE, Oxford (OxA) AMS 14C measurements on GeO 1354 to 1303 BCE and on Anatolian juniper from the late 21st to 20th centuries BCE, and Keck AMS 14C measurements on BCP 795 to 625 BCE.
“Hd GeO values compare well with previous Seattle LLGPC measurements on GeO 1700 to 1500 BCE (15), Oxford (OxA) AMS 14C measurements on GeO 1354 to 1303 BCE (24) and on Anatolian juniper from the late 21st to 20th centuries BCE (figs. S2 and S3) (46), and Keck Carbon Cycle Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of California, Irvine AMS 14C measurements on BCP 795 to 625 BCE (fig. S4)”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 8
- Authors
- Manning, S. W., Kromer, B., Dee, M. W., Friedrich, M., Higham, T. F. G., & Ramsey, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Radiocarbon and the Chronologies of Ancient Egypt
- Publisher
- Oxbow Books
- Published
- 2013-05-31
- Pages
- 121-145
- OpenAlex
- W2945611948
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxbow Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- radiocarbon calibration, Tell el-Amarna, 14th century BC, Late Bronze Age, chronology, Egyptian chronology, radiocarbon dating
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review