The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Network Analysis of Cuneiform Archives – a New Approach
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alstola, T. (2020) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · doi:10.1163/9789004365421 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Waerzeggers, C.
- Corresponding author
- Waerzeggers, Caroline
- Venue
- Documentary Sources in Ancient Near Eastern and Greco-Roman Economic History
- Publisher
- Oxbow Books
- Published
- 2014-08-31
- Pages
- 207-233
- OpenAlex
- W2946664639
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxbow Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Keywords
- social network analysis, cuneiform archives, scribal communities, cuneiform tablets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
