Cited by 6Archaeology and Historical StudiesBiblical Studies and InterpretationCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Linen Wick from the Northern Church at Shivta, Israel

Sukenik, Naama, Tepper, Yotam·2019·Glass, Wax and Metal: Lighting Technologies in Late Antique, Byzantine and Medieval Times

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvndv5k4.29

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fiber in the samples was identified as wool (sheep) based on morphology under a polarizing microscope.

    “The fiber was identified as wool on the basis of the morphology of its internal layer as observed under a polarizing microscope (Zeiss Axioscope 5) at x500 magnification.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sukenik, N., & Tepper, Y.
Venue
Glass, Wax and Metal: Lighting Technologies in Late Antique, Byzantine and Medieval Times
Published
2019-07-31
Pages
203-209
OpenAlex
W2969283270
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archaeopress Publishing Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
archaeological textiles, ancient Egyptian textiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review