Cited by 239Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsEcosystem dynamics and resilienceEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems

MAY, ROBERT M.·2019·Princeton University Press eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvs32rq4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most previous work on food web dynamics has relied on hypothetically parameterised networks.

    “Although the effects of species interactions on foodweb dynamics have been widely studied, most previous work has relied on hypothetically parameterised networks (Allesina and Tang 2012;May 2019;Yodzis 1988)”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
MAY, R. M.
Corresponding author
MAY, ROBERT M.
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2019-12-31
OpenAlex
W4285765153
Cited by
239
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 7
FWCI
15.39
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
model ecosystems, ecosystem stability, ecological complexity, ecosystem dynamics, population dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review