Cited by 25Cultural Identity and RepresentationAnthropological Studies and InsightsPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

After Difference: Queer Activism in Italy and Anthropological Theory

Open access
Heywood, Paolo·2018·Berghahn Books

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvw04db2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the authors' ethnographic material reveals less clear-cut tonal shifts than theorised by Paolo Heywood's account of double morality.

    “But much of our ethnographic material reveals less clear-cut tonal shifts. This is a more extensive phenomenon than is theorised by Paolo Heywood’s account of double morality”

    From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Heywood 2018

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heywood, P.
Corresponding author
Heywood, Paolo
Venue
Berghahn Books
Published
2018-02-19
OpenAlex
W3003614988
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 20
FWCI
8.46
Type
book
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Berghahn Books (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
difference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review