Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conjectures and Refutations

Open access
·2020·Radical Treatment

Abstract

To the outside observer, mathematics may appear as the definite system of truth. From this vantage point conjectures may seem a fringe phenomenon to be shunned; the poor man's theorem and an admittance of one's unsuccessful attempts of proving it. I will argue that aforementioned conjecture is false. I will argue for Karl Popper's view that "there is no more rational procedure than the method of trial and error--of conjecture and refutation: of boldly proposing theories; of trying our best to show that these are erroneous; and of accepting them tentatively if our critical efforts are unsuccessful." We will see that conjectures are an integral and essential part of research in the mathematical sciences. This will be illustrated with some surprising examples of conjectures and their refutations concerning the complexity of solving linear systems, the dimensions of algebraic varieties, and the equality of symmetric and nonsymmetric rank of symmetric tensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 3,373

Metadata

Venue
Radical Treatment
Publisher
MQUP
Published
2020-02-27
Pages
54-77
OpenAlex
W2073984231
Cited by
3,373
References
4
FWCI
275.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conjectures and Refutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9
The paper
Conjectures and Refutations. (2020). Radical Treatment. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.