The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploring Intervisibility Networks: A Case Study From Bronze and Iron Age Istria (Croatia and Slovenia)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Networks of intervisibility of archaeological sites and prominent landscape features can be successfully modelled and analysed, and may be of interest for understanding navigation and movement.
“Recent studies (Bourgeois 2013, 105-158;Čučković 2015) have drawn attention to the fact that networks of intervisibility of archaeological sites and prominent landscape features can be successfully modelled and analysed, and may be of interest for understanding navigation and movement as well.”
From Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Čučković 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches
Verhagen, P., Nuninger, L., & Groenhuijzen, M. R. (2019) · Computational Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04576-0_11 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- ČUČKOVIĆ, Z.
- Venue
- CAA2014: 21st Century Archaeology
- Publisher
- Archaeopress Publishing Ltd
- Published
- 2015-03-31
- Pages
- 469-478
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
