Elite Actors in the Protohistoric: Elite Identities and Interaction with Europeans in the Apalachee and Powhatan Chiefdoms
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chesapeake colonial history also highlights strategies by Native American elites to reproduce their status, a process limited by prior practice and established patterns of discourse.
“Chesapeake colonial history also highlights strategies employed by Native American elites to reproduce their status, a process constrained by ''prior practice and established patterns of discourse'' (Scarry and Maxham 2002, p. 168).”
From The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations (2011) · cites this paper as Scarry and Maxham 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations
Gallivan, M. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-010-9048-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scarry, J. F., & Maxham, M. D.
- Venue
- Between Contacts and Colonies
- Publisher
- University of Alabama Press
- Published
- 2002-10-23
- Pages
- 142-169
- OpenAlex
- W4413261619
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Alabama Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- elite actors, protohistory, social elites, ritual performance, prehistoric societies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
