The Deadly Politics of Giving: Exchange and Violence at Ajacan, Roanoke, and Jamestown
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysis of exchange involving Jamestown colonists, an earlier Spanish mission, and the Roanoke Colony indicates that Europeans repeatedly broke indigenous gift-exchange rules and thereby provoked native hostilities.
“Analysis of exchange involving Jamestown colonists, an earlier Spanish mission, and the Roanoke Colony indicates that Europeans repeatedly violated indigenous gift-exchange rules and in the process provoked native hostilities (Mallios 2006).”
From The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations (2011) · cites this paper as Mallios 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations
Gallivan, M. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-010-9048-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- MALLIOS, S.
- Corresponding author
- MALLIOS, SETH
- Venue
- University of Alabama Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Alabama Press
- Published
- 2006-08-20
- OpenAlex
- W2345848952
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Alabama Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- Keywords
- giving, philanthropy, gift exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
