The basis for the Egyptian dates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Estimations for year 1 of Ahmose (II) produced a variety of accession years ranging from 1580 BCE to 1524 BCE.
“Such assessments produced a variety of accession years for Ahmose (II), ranging from 1580 BCE [88] to 1524 BCE [89].”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
The low historical chronologies by Krauss and Warburton (1502 BCE) and Hornung et al. (1517 BCE) for Ahmose year 22 are nearest to the calibrated radiocarbon date of both peaks of GrA-64347.
“Taking into account that mudbrick fabrication probably occurred around year 22 of Ahmose’s reign [80,111,112], the low historical chronologies by Krauss and Warburton [89] and Hornung et al. [76], respectively 1502 BCE [89] and 1517 BCE [76] for Ahmose year 22, are nearest to the calibrated radiocarbon date of both peaks.”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
Historical dating options for the accession year of Amenhotep I range from 1557 BCE to 1498 BCE.
“Historical dating options for the accession year of Pharaoh Amenhotep I (Table 2) range from a high of 1557 BCE [88] to a low of 1498 BCE [89].”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
The position of the tall peak around 1500 cal BCE of the calibrated radiocarbon age range of shabti UC 40179 fits the historical dating options for Amenhotep I.
“Hence the position of the tall peak around 1500 cal BCE (Fig 15) of the calibrated radiocarbon age range fits the above historical dating options.”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as Krauss and Warburton 2009
Low chronology historical options for year 22 of Ahmose, 1502 BCE [89] and 1517 BCE [76], appear closest to the high probability peaks in the calibration graph of the pure straw fragment.
“Low chronology historical options for year 22 of Amose (Table 2), 1502 BCE [89] and 1517 BCE [76], appear closest to these high probability peaks in the calibration graph.”
From The Minoan Thera eruption predates Pharaoh Ahmose: Radiocarbon dating of Egyptian 17th to early 18th Dynasty museum objects (2025) · cites this paper as [89]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bruins, H. J., & van der Plicht, J. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330702 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krauss, R., & Warburton, D. A.
- ORCID
- Krauss, Rolf
- Venue
- Time's Up! Dating the Minoan eruption of Santorini
- Publisher
- Aarhus University Press
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- Pages
- 125-144
- OpenAlex
- W7162283069
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aarhus University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Egyptian chronology, chronology, dating systems, ancient Egypt
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review