The date of the Late Bronze Age eruption of Santorini
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The archaeological evidence favors a Thera eruption date after the beginning of the New Kingdom in Egypt, around 1500 BC or perhaps around 1530 BC.
“The archaeological evidence, on the other hand, favors an eruption date after the beginning of the New Kingdom in Egypt, which places the Thera eruption around 1500 BC (Bietak and Höflmayer 2007), or somewhat earlier, perhaps around 1530 BC (Warren 2009).”
From The Chronology of Tell El-Daba: A Crucial Meeting Point of<sup>14</sup>C Dating, Archaeology, and Egyptology in the 2nd Millennium BC (2012) · cites this paper as Warren 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 1
- Authors
- Warren, P.
- Corresponding author
- Warren, Peter
- Venue
- Time's Up! Dating the Minoan eruption of Santorini
- Publisher
- Aarhus University Press
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- Pages
- 181-186
- OpenAlex
- W7162300959
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aarhus University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Santorini eruption, Late Bronze Age, eruption chronology, Minoan civilization, Aegean archaeology, volcanic eruptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
