14C and 10Be around 1650 cal BC: are there contradictions between tree ring and ice core time scales?
Abstract
There is a debate about the date of the Minoan eruption of Santorini as reconstructed from a branch of an olive tree that was buried alive in trephra on Santorini2 and the dating of an ice core horizon attributed to this eruption.3 The olive branch was 14C-wiggle matched to the 14C calibration curve and yielded an age range of 1627-1600 bc4 while the counting of annual layers in the Greenland ice cores produced an age of 1642 (±5) bc.5 Here I will study the relative timing of the two time scales by comparing the cosmic ray signal as recorded by 14C in tree rings and 10Be in ice cores. The result reveals an intriguing age difference that is similar to the dating difference mentioned above. The origin of the difference is unclear. This analysis supports both the dating of the Santorini eruption with the olive branch and the identification of this eruption in the ice cores, but it suggests unrecognised uncertainties in the tree ring 14C data, the ice core chronology or both.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ice-core signal argued to be possibly associated with the Santorini eruption is published as dating ~1642 BC, but an apparent unexplained dating problem could see the ice-core date reduced by ~20 yr, potentially placing it into the same time period.
“The ice-core signal that has been argued to be possibly associated with the Santorini eruption (despite criticisms) by Vinther et al. (2006Vinther et al. ( , 2008) ) is published as dating -1642 BC, but an apparent dating problem (unexplained) exists that could see the ice-core date reduced by ~20 yr (Muscheler 2009), potentially also placing it into the same time period.”
From Considerations of the Scale of Radiocarbon Offsets in the East Mediterranean, and Considering a Case for the Latest (Most Recent) Likely Date for the Santorini Eruption (2012) · cites this paper as Muscheler 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 3
- Authors
- Muscheler, R.
- Corresponding author
- Muscheler, Raimund
- ORCID
- Muscheler, Raimund
- Venue
- Time's Up! Dating the Minoan eruption of Santorini
- Publisher
- Aarhus University Press
- Published
- 2009-12-31
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 275-284
- OpenAlex
- W2264751012
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aarhus University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Keywords
- Santorini eruption, Minoan eruption, beryllium-10, cosmic ray exposure, tree rings, ice cores, radiocarbon dating, chronology, olive branch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review