Inteligencia artificial y Derechos fundamentales.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
En el sistema jurídico europeo, el RGPD prevé una limitación especial aplicable a los sistemas de IA referida a la toma de decisiones automatizadas, reconociendo el derecho a no estar sujeto a decisiones automatizadas que puedan tener un impacto legal significativo o afectar de manera similar.
“En el sistema jurídico europeo, el Reglamento (UE) 2016/679, Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGPD) 10 , prevé una especial limitación aplicable a los sistemas de IA y referida a la toma de decisiones automatizadas.Así, se reconoce a cualquier persona el derecho a no estar sujeta a decisiones automatizadas que, basadas únicamente en el procesamiento de datos, puedan tener un impacto”
From Análisis comparado de los distintos enfoques regulatorios de la inteligencia artificial en la Unión Europea, EE. UU., China e Iberoamérica (2024) · cites this paper as Rebollo Delgado, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pérez-Ugena Coromina, M. (2024) · Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional · doi:10.18042/cepc/aijc.28.05
- Authors
- Delgado, L. R.
- Corresponding author
- Delgado, Lucrecio Rebollo
- Venue
- Dykinson eBooks
- Publisher
- Dykinson
- Published
- 2023-04-10
- OpenAlex
- W4384949436
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dykinson eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, fundamental rights, human rights, AI regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
