The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Death Glitch: How Techno-Solutionism Fails Us in This Life and Beyond
Abstract
An accessible yet erudite deep dive into how platforms are remaking experiences of death Since the internet’s earliest days, people have died and mourned online. In quiet corners of past iterations of the web, the dead linger. But attempts at preserving the data of the dead are often ill-fated, for websites and devices decay and die, just as people do. Death disrupts technologists’ plans for platforms. It reveals how digital production is always collaborative, undermining the entrepreneurial platform economy and highlighting the flaws of techno-solutionism. Big Tech has authority not only over people’s lives but over their experiences of death as well. Ordinary users and workers, though, advocate for changes to tech companies’ policies around death. Drawing on internet histories along with interviews with founders of digital afterlife startups, caretakers of illness blogs, and transhumanist tinkerers, the technology scholar Tamara Kneese takes readers on a vibrant tour of the ways that platforms and people work together to care for digital remains. What happens when commercial platforms encounter the messiness of mortality?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, as Kneese (2023) argues, these services come at a cost to the living, in the human labour required for their operation, and the wider maintenance and the environmental costs in all forms of digital production.”
From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as Kneese 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- KNEESE, T.
- Corresponding author
- KNEESE, TAMARA
- ORCID
- KNEESE, TAMARA
- Venue
- Yale University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Yale University Press
- Published
- 2023-08-15
- OpenAlex
- W4385726333
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Yale University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical and Cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review