Cited by 8Anthropological Studies and InsightsCultural Identity and RepresentationMigration, Refugees, and Integration

Us and the Others: The Familial Roots of Ethnonationalism

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenäus·1998·Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/jj.7079921.7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indoctrinability might be linked to an evolved psychological predisposition for prepared or constrained learning of what is important for group-living, self-interested individuals: learning about group-cohesion and maintenance of group-boundaries.

    “As an individual disposition, indoctrinability might be linked to an evolved psychological predisposition for prepared or constrained learning (Plotkin, 1998) of what is important for a species of group-living, but self-interested, individuals: learning about group-cohesion and the maintenance of group-boundaries (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1982, 1998).”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998

  • Gene-culture coevolution and 'cultural brains' may have fostered individual indoctrinability.

    “By the same token, gene-culture coevolution and 'cultural brains' may have fostered individual indoctrinability (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998)-that is, individual susceptibility to social influence and the proclivity for bonding with the group.”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998

  • Humans might have genetically evolved predispositions for indoctrinability and constrained learning of what is adaptive for self-interested individuals living in groups.

    “Yet humans might have genetically evolved predispositions for indoctrinability and constrained learning of what is adaptive for self-interested individuals living in groups.”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998

  • In most mammalian species, mothers intensively interact with their newborn children after birth, e.g. by licking or vocalization, which correlates with the emission of oxytocin.

    “Likewise, in most mammalian species, mothers intensively interact with their newborn children after birth, e.g. by licking or vocalization (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998: 36), which correlates with the emission of the neurotransmitter oxytocin (Sapolsky, 2018: 109).”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998

  • Oxytocin seems to be important in mother-child bonds, and could have been a preadaptation that became extended to regulate the distinction between in- and out-group.

    “Oxytocin seems to be important in mother-child bonds, and could have been a preadaptation (Turner, 2021: 44) that became extended to regulate the distinction between in-and out-group (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998: 38).”

    From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998

Authors
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
Venue
Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare
Published
1998-10-01
Pages
21-54
OpenAlex
W4387086774
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Berghahn Books (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
us versus them, otherness, identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review