Us and the Others: The Familial Roots of Ethnonationalism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indoctrinability might be linked to an evolved psychological predisposition for prepared or constrained learning of what is important for group-living, self-interested individuals: learning about group-cohesion and maintenance of group-boundaries.
“As an individual disposition, indoctrinability might be linked to an evolved psychological predisposition for prepared or constrained learning (Plotkin, 1998) of what is important for a species of group-living, but self-interested, individuals: learning about group-cohesion and the maintenance of group-boundaries (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1982, 1998).”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998
Gene-culture coevolution and 'cultural brains' may have fostered individual indoctrinability.
“By the same token, gene-culture coevolution and 'cultural brains' may have fostered individual indoctrinability (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998)-that is, individual susceptibility to social influence and the proclivity for bonding with the group.”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998
Humans might have genetically evolved predispositions for indoctrinability and constrained learning of what is adaptive for self-interested individuals living in groups.
“Yet humans might have genetically evolved predispositions for indoctrinability and constrained learning of what is adaptive for self-interested individuals living in groups.”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998
In most mammalian species, mothers intensively interact with their newborn children after birth, e.g. by licking or vocalization, which correlates with the emission of oxytocin.
“Likewise, in most mammalian species, mothers intensively interact with their newborn children after birth, e.g. by licking or vocalization (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998: 36), which correlates with the emission of the neurotransmitter oxytocin (Sapolsky, 2018: 109).”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998
Oxytocin seems to be important in mother-child bonds, and could have been a preadaptation that became extended to regulate the distinction between in- and out-group.
“Oxytocin seems to be important in mother-child bonds, and could have been a preadaptation (Turner, 2021: 44) that became extended to regulate the distinction between in-and out-group (Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998: 38).”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality
Windzio, M. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09531-2
- Authors
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.
- Venue
- Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Pages
- 21-54
- OpenAlex
- W4387086774
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Berghahn Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural Identity and Representation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- us versus them, otherness, identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review