The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Evolution of Human Ultrasociality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Generally, competition and conflict might increase between-group migration (Richerson & Boyd, 1998: 81).”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Richerson & Boyd, 1998
In the citing paper
“Moreover, a crucial resource hunter-gatherers might have been fighting for, also between groups, could have been women (Chagnon, 1988: 986;Ehrlich, 2000: 212;Richerson & Boyd, 1998: 81).”
From Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality (2026) · cites this paper as Richerson & Boyd, 1998
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Durkheim, Indoctrinability and the Moral Ambivalence of Human Sociality
Windzio, M. (2026) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-026-09531-2
Metadata
- Authors
- Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R.
- Venue
- Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare
- Publisher
- Berghahn Books
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Pages
- 71-96
- OpenAlex
- W4387086732
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Berghahn Books (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- human evolution, social evolution, cooperation, kin selection, reciprocal altruism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
