The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection Models in Accounting Research
Open accessAbstract
This study explains the challenges associated with the Heckman (1979) procedure to control for selection bias, assesses the quality of its application in accounting research, and offers guidance for better implementation of selection models. A survey of 75 recent accounting articles in leading journals reveals that many researchers implement the technique in a mechanical way with relatively little appreciation of important econometric issues and problems surrounding its use. Using empirical examples motivated by prior research, we illustrate that selection models are fragile and can yield quite literally any possible outcome in response to fairly minor changes in model specification. We conclude with guidance on how researchers can better implement selection models that will provide more convincing evidence on potential selection bias, including the need to justify model specifications and careful sensitivity analyses with respect to robustness and multicollinearity. Data Availability: Data used are available from public sources identified in the study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Accruals Quality and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1141 · Cited by 1,366
Cited by
Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50629 · Cited by 1,681
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa071 · Cited by 1,136
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3204420 · Cited by 1,136
Internal control and management guidance
Feng, M., Li, C., & McVay, S. (2009) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.004 · Cited by 678
FinTech adoption and bank risk-taking: Evidence from China
Guo, P., Cheng, M., & Shen, Y. (2024) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2022.2140755 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2011-11-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 589-616
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2105662497
- Cited by
- 1,406
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 62.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.