The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Measures of Air Pollution in the Electric Utility Industry
Abstract
This study examines the relation between the market value of equity and nonfinancial pollution measures (sulfur dioxide emissions) that capture firms' exposure to future environmental liabilities. I find that a nonfinancial pollution proxy is value-relevant for high-polluting electric utilities targeted for air pollution abatement by Phase One of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). On average, these utilities' exposure to (unbooked) future environmental liabilities decreased their mean 1990 share price by 16 percent. Moreover, the value relevance of the nonfinancial pollution proxy (1) increased in response to the passage of the stringent 1990 CAAA environmental legislation, and then (2) declined as the market subsequently reduced estimated compliance costs in response to changing economic and technological factors. Utilities not targeted by Phase One of the 1990 CAAA faced minimal exposure to future environmental liabilities and I find no significant relation between their pollution indicators and share prices. I also find that investors in the high-polluting rate-regulated utilities that were targeted by Phase One positively value a favorable regulatory climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(03)00032-1 · Cited by 2,080
Self-citationFirm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures
Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50629 · Cited by 1,681
Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/0963818042000339617 · Cited by 1,011
Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47 · Cited by 820
The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative?
Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.008 · Cited by 672
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, K. E.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-228
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2120915820
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Measures of Air Pollution in the Electric Utility Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.209
- The paper
- Hughes, K. E. (2000). The Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Measures of Air Pollution in the Electric Utility Industry. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.