The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Information Role of Conservatism
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we argue that information asymmetry between firm insiders and outside equity investors generates conservatism in financial statements. Conservatism reduces the manager's incentives and ability to manipulate accounting numbers and so reduces information asymmetry and the deadweight losses that information asymmetry generates. This increases firm and equity values. Our empirical tests are consistent with our proposition that information asymmetry is significantly positively related to conservatism after controlling for other demands for conservatism. Further, our tests are more consistent with our prediction that changes in information asymmetry between equity investors lead to changes in conservatism than the FASB's proposition that conservatism produces information asymmetry among equity investors. An important implication is that, if the FASB was successful in meeting its stated goal of eliminating conservatism, then it would increase information asymmetry between investors, not reduce it. This outcome is inconsistent with the objectives of the Securities Acts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The determinants of corporate leverage and dividend policies
Barclay, M. J., Smith, C. W., & Watts, R. L. (1995) · Journal of applied corporate finance · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1995.tb00259.x · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of archival auditing research
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 · Cited by 3,188
The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting
Armstrong, C. S., Guay, W. R., & Weber, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001 · Cited by 1,494
Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism
Hui, K. W., Klasa, S., & Yeung, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.007 · Cited by 458
Disclosure theories and disclosure measures
Urquiza, F. B., Navarro, M. C. A., Trombetta, M., & Lara, J. M. G. (2010) · Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad · doi:10.1080/02102412.2010.10779686 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 447-478
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W3123372730
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 157.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Information Role of Conservatism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
- The paper
- LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The Information Role of Conservatism. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.