The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements
Abstract
This study addresses the impact of certain audit committee characteristics identified by the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees (BRC) on the likelihood of financial restatement. We examine 88 restatements of annual results (without allegations of fraud) in the period 1991–1999, together with a matched pairs control group of firms of similar size, exchange listing, industry and auditor type. We find that the independence and activity level (our proxy for audit committee diligence) of the audit committee exhibit a significant and negative association with the occurrence of restatement. We also document a significant negative association between an audit committee that includes at least one member with financial expertise and restatement. To test the robustness of the results we also consider a sample of 44 fraud and no-fraud firms and arrive at largely similar findings. Our results underscore the importance of the BRC's recommendations as a means of strengthening the monitoring and oversight role that the audit committee plays in the financial reporting process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of archival auditing research
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 · Cited by 3,188
Corporate Governance in the Post‐Sarbanes‐Oxley Era: Auditors’ Experiences*
COHEN, J., KRISHNAMOORTHY, G., & WRIGHT, A. (2010) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01026.x · Cited by 486
Detecting Management Fraud in Public Companies
Cecchini, M., Aytug, H., Koehler, G. J., & Pathak, P. (2010) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1174 · Cited by 367
SOX after Ten Years: A Multidisciplinary Review
Coates, J. C., & Srinivasan, S. (2014) · Accounting Horizons · doi:10.2308/acch-50759 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F.
- Venue
- AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-87
- ISSN
- 0278-0380 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7991
- OpenAlex
- W2108377819
- Cited by
- 1,664
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 117.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
- The paper
- Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.