The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auditors' Identification with Their Clients and Its Effect on Auditors' Objectivity
Open accessAbstract
This study empirically models auditors' relationships with their clients. The Independence Standards Board (ISB 2000) identified auditors' familiarity with the client as one of five threats to auditor independence. Yet familiarity with the client is necessary for auditors to understand the client well enough to plan and perform an effective and efficient audit. We introduce a theory-based measure of the extent to which auditors identify with a client, which we then use to directly measure auditors' attachment to the client and the threat of this attachment to auditors' objectivity. The responses of 252 practicing auditors support our theoretical predictions. Specifically, we find that auditors do identify with their clients and that auditors who identify more with a client are more likely to acquiesce to the client-preferred position. On the other hand, more experienced auditors and auditors who exhibit higher levels of professional identification are less likely to acquiesce to the client's position.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 · Cited by 1,845 · cited 2×
“The ISB’s concern is supported by a large body of research in social psychology and organizational behavior finding that social identities significantly affect individuals’ attitudes and behaviors (for reviews, see Hogg and Terry 2000; Ellemers et al. 2002; Riketta 2005).”
Background
Cited by
Acceleration of Age-Related Hearing Loss by Early Noise Exposure: Evidence of a Misspent Youth
Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4985-05.2006 · Cited by 697
Auditor Independence and Audit Quality: A Literature Review
Tepalagul, N., & Lin, L. (2015) · Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance · doi:10.1177/0148558x14544505 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M.
- Venue
- AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0278-0380 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7991
- OpenAlex
- W3126021128
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Auditors' Identification with Their Clients and Its Effect on Auditors' Objectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.1
- The paper
- Bamber, E. M., & Iyer, V. M. (2007). Auditors' Identification with Their Clients and Its Effect on Auditors' Objectivity. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2007.26.2.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.