Information ethics: An exploratory study from an international perspective.
Abstract
This article examines the role of culture on information technology (IT) practices by comparing attitudes toward information and IT-related social issues among university students in three Chinese cultures (Hong Kong, Taiwan and China) and in the United States. The survey instrument contained ethical dilemmas based on Mason's (1986) four areas of information ethics: privacy, access, property and accuracy. The results indicate that significant differences exist between the groups of students in their overall assessment of ethical dilemmas, as well as the factors that they view as important in making that assessment. Consistent with cultural differences, students from the United States tended to view decisions from a more legalistic or rule-based perspective while students from the Chinese cultures placed more emphasis on relationships. In contrast, the groups differed only slightly in their responses to an accuracy scenario. These findings indicate that, while culture still has a strong influence, there are areas where views of information ethics seem to converge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A global perspective on library association codes of ethics
Shachaf, P. (2005) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.008 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eining, M. M., & Lee, G. M.
- Affiliations
- 1
- 2
- Venue
- Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0888-7985 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7164674662
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- information ethics, cultural differences, ethical dilemmas, privacy, access, intellectual property, accuracy, university students, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review