Cited by 1Ethics in Business and EducationInformation Society and Technology TrendsInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Information ethics: An exploratory study from an international perspective.

Eining, Martha M., Lee, Grace M.·1997·Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

This article examines the role of culture on information technology (IT) practices by comparing attitudes toward information and IT-related social issues among university students in three Chinese cultures (Hong Kong, Taiwan and China) and in the United States. The survey instrument contained ethical dilemmas based on Mason's (1986) four areas of information ethics: privacy, access, property and accuracy. The results indicate that significant differences exist between the groups of students in their overall assessment of ethical dilemmas, as well as the factors that they view as important in making that assessment. Consistent with cultural differences, students from the United States tended to view decisions from a more legalistic or rule-based perspective while students from the Chinese cultures placed more emphasis on relationships. In contrast, the groups differed only slightly in their responses to an accuracy scenario. These findings indicate that, while culture still has a strong influence, there are areas where views of information ethics seem to converge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2308/jis-697362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eining, M. M., & Lee, G. M.
Affiliations
  • 1
  • 2
Venue
Journal of Information Systems
Published
1997-03-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
0888-7985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7164674662
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
information ethics, cultural differences, ethical dilemmas, privacy, access, intellectual property, accuracy, university students, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review