The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Returns on Investments in Information Technology: A Research Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the return on investments in information technology (IT) is the focus of a large and growing body of research. The objective of this paper is to synthesize this research and develop a model to guide future research in the evaluation of information technology investments. We focus on archival studies that use accounting or market measures of firm performance. We emphasize those studies where accounting researchers with interest in market-level analyses of systems and technology issues may hold a competitive advantage over traditional information systems (IS) researchers. We propose numerous opportunities for future research. These include examining the relation between IT and business processes, and business processes and overall firm performance, understanding the effect of contextual factors on the IT-performance relation, examining the IT-performance relation in an international context, and examining the interactive effects of IT spending and IT management on firm performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment?
Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018 · Cited by 1,624
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044052 · Cited by 1,187
Chae, H.-C., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.14 · Cited by 461
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Coombs, C., Hislop, D., Taneva, S. K., & Barnard, S. (2020) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101600 · Cited by 301
“Four models that have been particularly prominent in the IS literature are, 1) IT and Economic Performance Framework (Dedrick et al., 2003); 2) Benefits of IT Investments Framework (Dehning and Richardson, 2002); 3) IT Business Value Model (Melville et al., 2004); and 4) Process Model of IT Business Value (Soh and Mar…”
BackgroundThe Business Value of IT: A Synthesis and Framework of Archival Research
Masli, A., Richardson, V. J., Sanchez, J. M., & Smith, R. E. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-10117 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehning, B., & Richardson, V. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-30
- ISSN
- 0888-7985 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7959
- OpenAlex
- W3124420429
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
