The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations.
Abstract
Abstract Discusses performance evaluations in management accounting. Use of an agency theory model to explore the economic impact of variations in performance measure congruence; Multi-task agencies; Multiple performance measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contracting theory and accounting
Lambert, R. A. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00037-4 · Cited by 1,050
Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47 · Cited by 820
Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.-M., & Chenhall, R. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.010 · Cited by 422
Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., & Sarto, F. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8 · Cited by 365
Performance evaluation and creativity: Balancing originality and usefulness
Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101552 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Feltham, G. A., & Xie, J.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-453
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W170417797
- Cited by
- 901
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/tar-9412141436
- The paper
- Feltham, G. A., & Xie, J. (1994). Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-9412141436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
