Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesHead and Neck Cancer StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Functional Outcomes after Primary Mandibular Resection and Reconstruction with the Fibular Free Flap

Seikaly, Hadi, Maharaj, Mitra, Rieger, Jana, Harris, Jeff·2005·The Journal of Otolaryngology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined prospectively the functional outcomes of a cohort of patients who have undergone mandibulectomy and primary fibular free flap reconstruction, with particular emphasis on longitudinal comparison of the preoperative function with that in the postoperative and post-radiation therapy time periods. METHODS: Speech and swallowing data were gathered at three evaluation times (preoperatively, pre-radiation therapy, and post-radiation therapy) for patients treated for oral cavity cancer with mandibular resection and reconstruction with a fibular free flap. Single words and sentences were recorded and analyzed for speech intelligibility. Modified barium swallows of liquid, pudding, and cookie consistencies were analyzed and graded for problems in the oral preparatory and oral phase according to the University of Chicago Center for Speech and Swallowing Disorders Oropharyngeal Mobility Data Form. RESULTS: There was no significant difference across any of the evaluation times for single-word or sentence intelligibility. The swallowing data showed no instances of post-treatment aspiration or laryngeal penetration. There were also no significant differences in any of the swallowing parameters across treatment times. CONCLUSIONS: Osteocutaneous fibular free flaps are an excellent reconstructive option for mandibular and floor of the mouth defects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2310/7070.2005.03060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Seikaly, H., Maharaj, M., Rieger, J., & Harris, J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2005
Volume
34
Issue
01
Pages
25
ISSN
0381-6605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979862129
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
mandibulectomy, fibula free flap, osteocutaneous free flap, mandibular reconstruction, oral cancer, speech intelligibility, dysphagia, swallowing function, radiotherapy, postoperative outcomes, floor of mouth defects
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Deglutition Disorders, Fibula, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Mandible, Middle Aged, Mouth Floor, Mouth Neoplasms, Neoplasm Staging, Prospective Studies, Speech Intelligibility, Speech Production Measurement, Surgical Flaps, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.