The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Statistical Mesh Shape Analysis with Nonlandmark Nonrigid Registration
Abstract
The analysis of shape represented as surface meshes is an important tool in anthropology and biomedicine for the study of aging, post-treatment development or sexual dimorphism. Most approaches rely on nonrigid registration using manually placed homologous landmarks, it is however often the case that some regions cannot be landmarked due to the lack of clear anatomical features. We therefore present a method of analyzing and visualizing the variability of a set of surface models that does not rely on landmarks for feature matching and uses coherent point drift (CPD), a nonrigid registration algorithm, instead. Our approach is based on the topology transfer of one arbitrarily selected base mesh to all other meshes with the use of CPD. The procedure ensures the identical meanings of corresponding vertices across the sample and allows the use of multivariate statistics even with shapes that would be difficult to process with methods that rely on landmarks for feature-matching.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CPD-DCA was used to create homologous representations of facial surfaces.
“We therefore used the proven workflow CPD-DCA (coherent point drift—dense correspondence analysis) [37] to create homologous representations of our facial surfaces.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dupej, J., Krajicek, V., Veleminska, J., & Pelikan, J.
- Venue
- Eurographics Association
- Publisher
- Eurographics Association
- Published
- 2014
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review