Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Statistical Mesh Shape Analysis with Nonlandmark Nonrigid Registration

Dupej, Jan, Vaclav Krajicek, Veleminska, Jana, Pelikan, Josef·2014·Eurographics Association

Abstract

The analysis of shape represented as surface meshes is an important tool in anthropology and biomedicine for the study of aging, post-treatment development or sexual dimorphism. Most approaches rely on nonrigid registration using manually placed homologous landmarks, it is however often the case that some regions cannot be landmarked due to the lack of clear anatomical features. We therefore present a method of analyzing and visualizing the variability of a set of surface models that does not rely on landmarks for feature matching and uses coherent point drift (CPD), a nonrigid registration algorithm, instead. Our approach is based on the topology transfer of one arbitrarily selected base mesh to all other meshes with the use of CPD. The procedure ensures the identical meanings of corresponding vertices across the sample and allows the use of multivariate statistics even with shapes that would be difficult to process with methods that rely on landmarks for feature-matching.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.2312/sgp20141384

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dupej, J., Krajicek, V., Veleminska, J., & Pelikan, J.
Venue
Eurographics Association
Publisher
Eurographics Association
Published
2014
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review