The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Periodontal status of adult patients treated with fixed buccal appliances and removable aligners over one year of active orthodontic therapy
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To compare the periodontal status of adults treated with fixed buccal orthodontic appliances vs removable orthodontic aligners over 1 year of active therapy. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 42 subjects; 22 treated with fixed buccal orthodontic appliances and 20 treated with removable aligners. Clinical indices recorded included: plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing pocket depth (PPD). Plaque samples were assessed for hydrolysis of N-benzoyl-DL-arginine-naphthylamide (BANA test). Indices and BANA scores were recorded before treatment and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after initiation of orthodontic therapy. Results: After 6 weeks, only mean PPD was greater in the fixed buccal orthodontic appliance group. However, after 6 months, the fixed buccal orthodontic appliance group had significantly greater mean PI, PPD, and GI scores and was 5.739 times more likely to have a higher BANA score. After 12 months, the fixed buccal orthodontic appliance group continued to have greater mean PI, GI, and PPD, while a trend was noted for higher BANA scores and BOP. Conclusions: These results suggest treatment with fixed buccal orthodontic appliances is associated with decreased periodontal status and increased levels of periodontopathic bacteria when compared to treatment with removable aligners over the 12-month study duration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding
Gorelick, L., Geiger, A. M., & Gwinnett, A. J. (1982) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-x · Cited by 1,145
Årtun, J., Spadafora, A. T., Shapiro, P. A., McNeill, R. W., & Chapko, M. K. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1987.tb00948.x · Cited by 71
Cited by
Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment
Weir, T. (2017) · Australian Dental Journal · doi:10.1111/adj.12480 · Cited by 459
Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial
Chhibber, A., Agarwal, S., Yadav, S., Kuo, C.-L., & Upadhyay, M. (2018) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.10.009 · Cited by 123
Sifakakis, I., Papaioannou, W., Papadimitriou, A., Kloukos, D., Papageorgiou, S. N., & Eliades, T. (2018) · Progress in Orthodontics · doi:10.1186/s40510-018-0230-4 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Karkhanechi, M., Chow, D., Sipkin, J., Sherman, D., Boylan, R. J., Norman, R. G., Craig, R. G., & Cisneros, G. J.
- Venue
- The Angle Orthodontist
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 146-151
- ISSN
- 0003-3219 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7103
- OpenAlex
- W1976982164
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Periodontal status of adult patients treated with fixed buccal appliances and removable aligners over one year of active orthodontic therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2319/031212-217.1
- The paper
- Karkhanechi, M., Chow, D., Sipkin, J., Sherman, D., Boylan, R. J., Norman, R. G., Craig, R. G., & Cisneros, G. J. (2013). Periodontal status of adult patients treated with fixed buccal appliances and removable aligners over one year of active orthodontic therapy. The Angle Orthodontist. https://doi.org/10.2319/031212-217.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.