The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 3 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data
Open accessAbstract
This paper quantitatively evaluates the accuracy of the base of aircraft data (BADA) model by comparing calculated fuel flow and total fuel consumption with flight data recorded by airliners' quick access recorder systems. For future more efficient air transportation system research, it is necessary to derive fuel consumption for an arbitrary flight trajectory with good accuracy. BADA, the European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) aircraft performance model is widely used for such purposes, but there is only a small number of papers which discuss its accuracy with actual flight data. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the BADA model has sufficient accuracy to deal with the study of air transportation systems. As a result of comparison conducted for a single fleet of twin engine wide-body jet passenger aircraft, calculated fuel flow showed good agreement with the flight data in the cruise phase and it was found that the error between the BADA model and flight data falls within plus or minus 5 [%] for a whole flight.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
19 Own result · 4 Own interpretation · 3 Sources not found · 1 No basis given
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TFC calculated from the BADA model is smaller than that from flight data for the whole flight time in many cases because of large error in the climb phase.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean value of fuel flow error takes a large negative value in Fig. 9, because calculated fuel flow is smaller than the flight data in the climb phase in most cases.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since the calculated fuel flow varies around the flight data in the cruise phase, the mean value is close to zero as shown in Fig. 10.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since ground speed GS V in the flight data contains measurement noise”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 3.5. Filtering
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mean value of fuel flow error takes a large negative value in Fig. 9, because calculated fuel flow is smaller than the flight data in the climb phase in most cases.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the calculated TFC fits in well with the TFC obtained from flight data in the cruise phase as the percentage of error shows from -4.7 [%] to +4.2 [%]”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mean value takes a positive value in the descent phase as shown in Fig. 11.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“calculated fuel flow showed good agreement with the flight data in the cruise phase”
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusion · plain
“Calculated fuel flow is in close accordance with the flight data in the cruise phase for all flight cases.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. TFC error · plain
“They are in good agreement with the cruise phase.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > Abstract
plainstates an associationn = 18- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusion · plain
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if the cruise phase occupies a large part of the flight as in these 18 cases, the error for whole flight time falls within plus or minus 5 [%].”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a possible causen = 18- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is because the calculated fuel flow in the cruise phase which occupies a major part of the international flight is slightly larger than the flight data as shown in Fig. 7.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the fuel flow calculated by time derivative of the velocity amplifies high frequency noise.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 3.5. Filtering
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“calculated TFC is larger than flight data in the international route in case 17.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“since the calculated fuel flow varies around the flight data in the cruise phase, the mean value is close to zero as shown in Fig. 10.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the error between the BADA model and flight data falls within plus or minus 5 [%] for a whole flight.”
- Also stated in: § 4.3. TFC error · plain
“the error for whole flight time falls within plus or minus 5 [%].”
- Also stated in: § 5. Conclusion · plain
“the error between the BADA model and flight data is within plus or minus 5 [%].”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > Abstract
plainn = 18- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4.3. TFC error · plain
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this phase, the standard deviation is smaller than that of other phases because the calculated fuel flow takes the minimum value which is independent from the time derivative of velocity; i.e., the main cause of high frequency noise.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It can be seen that the calculated fuel flow contains high frequency noise due to time derivative of GS V .”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 3.5. Filtering
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It can be said that sufficient accuracy is obtained overall.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainn = 18- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this paper revealed that the BADA model has sufficient accuracy to calculate the fuel consumption for general flight trajectory”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 5. Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The 18 flight cases are representative of general flight trajectories for the aircraft type.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TFC calculated from the BADA model is smaller than that from flight data for the whole flight time in many cases because of large error in the climb phase.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 4
- Probably not a substantial claim. 4
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the accuracy reduces in the climb and descent phase as the percentage is -12.8 [%] to +1.5 [%] and -4.6 [%] to +21.2 [%], respectively.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this phase, the standard deviation is smaller than that of other phases because the calculated fuel flow takes the minimum value which is independent from the time derivative of velocity; i.e., the main cause of high frequency noise.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.2. Analysis of fuel flow error
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the accuracy reduces in the climb and descent phase as the percentage is -12.8 [%] to +1.5 [%] and -4.6 [%] to +21.2 [%], respectively.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For trajectory optimization, a performance model of aircraft must be accurate in order to make the analysis meaningful.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 1. Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The BADA model developed and maintained by a research group of EUROCONTROL is widely used in the research community of air traffic management.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“one of them suggests that fuel consumption derived with the BADA model has high accuracy in the cruise phase.12)”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [12] 12) Senzig, D. A., Fleming, G. G. and Iovinelli, R. J.: Fuel Consumption Modeling in Support of ATM Environmental Decision-Making, 8th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Napa, USA, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The accuracy of the BADA model is investigated in some papers, [10][11][12]”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [10][11][12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the accuracy reduces relatively in the climb and descent phases, the influence on the error for whole flight time is not very significant because the cruise phase, which has high accuracy, constitutes a large part of the flight.”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 5. Conclusion
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The velocity direction change is negligible.
“the velocity direction change is assumed to be negligible.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The aircraft is in steady flight with small bank angle.
“The lift coefficient is derived by assuming the aircraft in steady flight with small bank angle.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is necessary to derive fuel consumption for an arbitrary flight trajectory with good accuracy for future more efficient air transportation system research.
“For future more efficient air transportation system research, it is necessary to derive fuel consumption for an arbitrary flight trajectory with good accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 18 flight cases are representative of general flight trajectories for the aircraft type.
“this paper revealed that the BADA model has sufficient accuracy to calculate the fuel consumption for general flight trajectory”
The paper relies on this without support.
The QAR flight data accurately represent actual fuel flow and aircraft state.
“The flight data are from the same type of modern large passenger aircraft, for three domestic routes and one international route.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 5. Conclusion
“| Whole | -401[kg] | -5.20[%] | -173[kg] | -2.26[%] | -522[kg] | -6.07[%] |”
§ Accuracy Evaluation of an Aircraft Performance Model with Airliner Flight Data > 4.3. TFC error
“the error for whole flight time falls within plus or minus 5 [%].”
Citations
Cites
BADA: An advanced aircraft performance model for present and future ATM systems
Nuic, A., Poles, D., & Mouillet, V. (2010) · International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1002/acs.1176 · Cited by 209
Aircraft Trajectory Optimization and Contrails Avoidance in the Presence of Winds
Sridhar, B., Ng, H. K., & Chen, N. Y. (2011) · Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/1.53378 · Cited by 128
Advanced Aircraft Performance Modeling for ATM: Enhancements to the Bada Model
Nuić, A., Poinsot, C., Iagaru, M., et al. (2006) · IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) · doi:10.1109/dasc.2005.1563320 · Cited by 81
Trajectory computation Infrastructure based on BADA Aircraft Performance Model
Gallo, E., Lopez-Leones, J., Vilaplana, M. A., Navarro, F. A., & Nuic, A. (2007) · 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference · doi:10.1109/dasc.2007.4391830 · Cited by 34
Estimating Aircraft Fuel Flow for a Three-Degree Flight-Path-Angle Descent
Turgut, E. T. (2011) · Journal of Aircraft · doi:10.2514/1.c031260 · Cited by 21
Aircraft Trajectory Optimization and Contrails Avoidance in the Presence of Winds
Sridhar, B., Ng, H. K., & Chen, N. Y. (2010) · AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO) · doi:10.2514/6.2010-9139 · Cited by 21
Flight trajectory optimization for an efficient air transportation system
Wickramasinghe, N. K., Harada, A., & Miyazawa, Y. (2012) · Cited by 19
Self-citationA model to 4D descent trajectory guidance
Rodriguez, J. M. C., Deniz, L. G., Herrero, J. G., Portas, J. B., & Corredera, J. R. C. (2007) · 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference · doi:10.1109/dasc.2007.4391828 · Cited by 11
Nolan, M. (2009) · Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/b10401-25 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 4) Wickramasinghe, N. K., Totoki, H., Harada, A., Miyamoto, Y., Kozuka, T. and Miyazawa, Y.: Flight Trajectory Optimization for Jet Passenger Aircraft using Dynamic Programming, 2012 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, Jeju, 2012.
- 5) Fukuda, Y., Shirakawa, M. and Senoguchi, A.: Development and Evaluation of Trajectory Prediction Model, Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, 2010.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Majumdar, A., & Stettler, M. E. J. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b05608 · Cited by 250
Aircraft trajectory prediction and synchronization for air traffic management applications
Mondoloni, S., & Rozen, N. E. (2020) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2020.100640 · Cited by 73
Dynamic Programming Application to Airliner Four Dimensional Optimal Flight Trajectory
Miyazawa, Y., Wickramasinghe, N. K., Harada, A., et al. (2013) · AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference · doi:10.2514/6.2013-4969 · Cited by 54
Self-citationFlight Trajectory Optimization for Operational Performance Analysis of Jet Passenger Aircraft
Wickramasinghe, N. K., Miyamoto, Y., Harada, A., et al. (2014) · TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN · doi:10.2322/tastj.12.a17 · Cited by 24
Self-citationAnalysis of Fuel-Efficient Airliner Flight via Dynamic Programming Trajectory Optimization
Miyamoto, Y., Wickramasinghe, N. K., Harada, A., et al. (2013) · TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN · doi:10.2322/tastj.11.93 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- HARADA, A., MIYAMOTO, Y., MIYAZAWA, Y., & FUNABIKI, K.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- ORCID
- HARADA, Akinori
- Venue
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 0
- Pages
- 79-85
- ISSN
- 1884-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023347115
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN (publishedVersion)
- Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR) (Kyushu University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
- Keywords
- aircraft performance modeling, model accuracy, fuel flow, fuel consumption, flight data, airliners, air transport system, cruise phase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
