The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TAXONOMICAL STUDIES ON GLUTAMIC ACID-PRODUCING BACTERIA
Open accessAbstract
The taxonomical characters of 208 strains of glutamic acid-producing bacteria and the base compositions of DNA solated from representative strains were studied.These organisms are, in general, Gram-positive, non-sporulating, non-motile, ellipsoidal spheres to short rods, pleomorphic and require biotin for growth and accumulate aerobically large amounts of L-glutamic acid. Some minor differences are found in physiological characteristics of these strains.All strains examined are considered to belong to a single or very closely related species in genus Corynebacterium. They can beclassifiedphysiologically into 12 types. The guanine plus cytosine (G-C) content of DNA of these strains is varied as represented by three groups, groups I, II and III, G-C contents of which are 53, 56 and 65%, respectively.Group I contains most of the glutamic acid-producing strains and consists of the strains of the physiological types 1 to 10. On the other hand, those strains of groups II and III, which belong to physiological types 11 and 12, are different from those of group I in base composition of DNA. Although it is questionable whether the strains belonging to groups II and III could be assumed to belong to the same species as those belonging to group I, we consider it admittable to name all these organisms Corynebacterium glutamicum laying a stress on their common character of glutamic acid production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology /
American Society for Microbiology., Bergey, D. H., Breed, R. S., Hitchens, A. P., & Murray, E. G. D. (1948) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.60376 · Cited by 1,381
Cited by
van der Rest, M. E., Lange, C., & Molenaar, D. (1999) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530051557 · Cited by 466
Staphylococcus aureus Shifts toward Commensalism in Response to Corynebacterium Species
Ramsey, M. M., Freire, M. O., Gabrilska, R. A., Rumbaugh, K. P., & Lemon, K. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01230 · Cited by 299
Molenaar, D., van der Rest, M. E., Drysch, A., & Yücel, R. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.24.6884-6891.2000 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- ABE, S., TAKAYAMA, K.-I., & KINOSHITA, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Research Foundation
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-301
- ISSN
- 0022-1260 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-8037
- OpenAlex
- W2069556271
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TAXONOMICAL STUDIES ON GLUTAMIC ACID-PRODUCING BACTERIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2323/jgam.13.279
- The paper
- ABE, S., TAKAYAMA, K.-I., & KINOSHITA, S. (1967). TAXONOMICAL STUDIES ON GLUTAMIC ACID-PRODUCING BACTERIA. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.13.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.