The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wild Bird Indicators: Using Composite Population Trends of Birds as Measures of Environmental Health
Open accessAbstract
World leaders have set global and regional targets to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010, and their relative success, or failure, in meeting these aims will be measured against a set of indicators. For such indicators to be effective, they need to meet a range of practical and scientific criteria. Their development is often driven pragmatically by the information available, One such biodiversity indicator that has proven highly effective and influential in Europe is the wild bird indicator. This is based on the composite population trends of birds combined using a geometric mean and derived from national breeding bird surveys, Recent work has emphasized the importance of common species to ecosystem functioning and suggested that the depletion of their populations might significantly affect ecosystem services. National governments and the European Union are increasingly using these measures to assess sustainable development strategies, environmental and ecosystem health, as well as in the fulfillment of biodiversity targets, Equivalent indicators have been published in North America. There are a number of reasons to believe that birds might be useful indicators of biodiversity. They are sensitive to anthropogenic changes, they are well known, excellent time-series exist, and they have a resonance and connection with people and their lives. Yet, there are counter arguments and some risks in using birds in this way. Our work provides a blueprint for others to follow using similar data on birds or other taxa, and in other countries and regions. In the discussion, we review the strengths and weaknesses of using bird population trends as biodiversity indicators, and look forward to how this work might be developed. Wild bird indicators only measure a component of biodiversity change and need to be used carefully to assist policy makers and land managers in managing the natural resources and conserving nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monitoring Change in Vertebrate Abundance: the Living Planet Index
COLLEN, B., LOH, J., WHITMEE, S., McRAE, L., AMIN, R., & BAILLIE, J. E. M. (2009) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01117.x · Cited by 441
Cited by
A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets
Tittensor, D. P., Walpole, M., Hill, S. L. L., Boyce, D. G., Britten, G. L., Burgess, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Leadley, P. W., Regan, E. C., Alkemade, R., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257484 · Cited by 1,227
Self-citationEU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity
Pe'er, G., Dicks, L. V., Visconti, P., Arlettaz, R., Báldi, A., Benton, T. G., Collins, S., Dieterich, M., Gregory, R. D., Hartig, F., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253425 · Cited by 622
Self-citationCommon European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising
Inger, R., Gregory, R., Duffy, J. P., Stott, I., Voříšek, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2015) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12387 · Cited by 489
Self-citationTowsey, M., Wimmer, J., Williamson, I., & Roe, P. (2014) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.007 · Cited by 369
The geometric mean of relative abundance indices: a biodiversity measure with a difference
Buckland, S. T., Studeny, A. C., Magurran, A. E., Illian, J. B., & Newson, S. E. (2011) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es11-00186.1 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, R. D., & Strien, A. V.
- Venue
- Ornithological Science
- Publisher
- Ornithological Society of Japan
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-22
- ISSN
- 1347-0558 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140483882
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild Bird Indicators: Using Composite Population Trends of Birds as Measures of Environmental Health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2326/osj.9.3
- The paper
- Gregory, R. D., & Strien, A. V. (2010). Wild Bird Indicators: Using Composite Population Trends of Birds as Measures of Environmental Health. Ornithological Science. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.9.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.