Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Common Variants in the Six Known Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) Genes for Association With Type 2 Diabetes

Winckler, Wendy, Weedon, Michael N., Graham, Robert R., McCarroll, Steven A., Purcell, Shaun, Almgren, Peter, Tuomi, Tiinamaija, Gaudet, Daniel, Boström, Kristina Bengtsson, Walker, Mark, Hitman, Graham, Hattersley, Andrew T., McCarthy, Mark I., Ardlie, Kristin G., Hirschhorn, Joel N., Daly, Mark J., Frayling, Timothy M., Groop, Leif, Altshuler, David·2007·Diabetes

Abstract

An important question in human genetics is the extent to which genes causing monogenic forms of disease harbor common variants that may contribute to the more typical form of that disease. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the extent to which common variation in the six known maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) genes, which cause a monogenic form of type 2 diabetes, is associated with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, we determined patterns of common sequence variation in the genes encoding Gck, Ipf1, Tcf2, and NeuroD1 (MODY2 and MODY4–MODY6, respectively), selected a comprehensive set of 107 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that captured common variation, and genotyped each in 4,206 patients and control subjects from Sweden, Finland, and Canada (including family-based studies and unrelated case-control subjects). All SNPs with a nominal P value <0.1 for association to type 2 diabetes in this initial screen were then genotyped in an additional 4,470 subjects from North America and Poland. Of 30 nominally significant SNPs from the initial sample, 8 achieved consistent results in the replication sample. We found the strongest effect at rs757210 in intron 2 of TCF2, with corrected P values <0.01 for an odds ratio (OR) of 1.13. This association was observed again in an independent sample of 5,891 unrelated case and control subjects and 500 families from the U.K., for an overall OR of 1.12 and a P value <10−6 in >15,000 samples. We combined these results with our previous studies on HNF4α and TCF1 and explicitly tested for gene-gene interactions among these variants and with several known type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci, and we found no genetic interactions between these six genes. We conclude that although rare variants in these six genes explain most cases of MODY, common variants in these same genes contribute very modestly, if at all, to the common form of type 2 diabetes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db06-0202

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Winckler, W., Weedon, M. N., Graham, R. R., McCarroll, S. A., Purcell, S., Almgren, P., Tuomi, T., Gaudet, D., Boström, K. B., Walker, M., Hitman, G., Hattersley, A. T., McCarthy, M. I., Ardlie, K. G., Hirschhorn, J. N., Daly, M. J., Frayling, T. M., Groop, L., & Altshuler, D.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
685-693
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2122355663
Cited by
203
References
3
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Common Variants in the Six Known Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) Genes for Association With Type 2 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db06-0202
The paper
Winckler, W., Weedon, M. N., Graham, R. R., McCarroll, S. A., Purcell, S., Almgren, P., Tuomi, T., Gaudet, D., Boström, K. B., Walker, M., Hitman, G., Hattersley, A. T., McCarthy, M. I., Ardlie, K. G., Hirschhorn, J. N., Daly, M. J., Frayling, T. M., Groop, L., & Altshuler, D. (2007). Evaluation of Common Variants in the Six Known Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) Genes for Association With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.