The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeting of RhoA/ROCK Signaling Ameliorates Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy Independent of Glucose Control
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—RhoA, a small GTPase protein, and its immediate downstream target, Rho kinase (ROCK), control a wide variety of signal transduction pathways. Recent studies have shown that fasudil, a selective ROCK inhibitor, may play a pivotal role in a number of pathological conditions, ranging from cardiovascular diseases to pulmonary hypertension and erectile dysfunction. Considerable evidence suggests that some of the beneficial effects of statins may also stem from their modulatory effects on RhoA/ROCK signaling. In the current study, we hypothesized that pharmacological blockade of the RhoA/ROCK pathway with either fasudil or simvastatin would ameliorate progression of diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In two separate experiments, diabetic db/db mice received fasudil (10 mg · kg− · day− i.p.) or simvastatin (40 mg · kg− · day− p.o.) for 16 weeks. Untreated db/db and db/m mice served as controls. RESULTS—The kidney cortices of untreated db/db mice displayed increased ROCK activity compared with db/m mice. The fasudil-treated mice exhibited a significant reduction in ROCK activity, albuminuria, glomerular collagen IV accumulation, and urinary collagen IV excretion compared with untreated db/db mice. Interestingly, blood glucose was unaffected by fasudil administration. Treatment with simvastatin significantly attenuated RhoA activation in the kidney cortices of db/db mice and resulted in a significant reduction of albuminuria and mesangial matrix expansion. CONCLUSIONS—Based on these results, we propose that RhoA/ROCK blockade constitutes a novel approach to the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Our data also suggest a critical role for RhoA/ROCK activation in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isoprenoids as mediators of the biological effects of statins
Liao, J. K. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci0216421 · Cited by 352
Mechanisms of Statin-mediated Inhibition of Small G-protein Function
Cordle, A., Koenigsknecht-Talboo, J., Wilkinson, B., Limpert, A., & Landreth, G. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m505268200 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Diabetes and Kidney Disease: Role of Oxidative Stress
Jha, J. C., Banal, C., Chow, B. S. M., Cooper, M. E., & Jandeleit-Dahm, K. (2016) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2016.6664 · Cited by 660
Wang, W., Wang, Y., Long, J., Wang, J., Haudek, S. B., Overbeek, P., Chang, B. H. J., Schumacker, P. T., & Danesh, F. R. (2012) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.009 · Cited by 476
Self-citationPathophysiology of the Diabetic Kidney
Vallon, V., & Komers, R. (2011) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100049 · Cited by 259
RhoA/Rho kinase pathway contributes to the pathogenesis of thermal hyperalgesia in diabetic mice
Ohsawa, M., Aasato, M., Hayashi, S.-S., & Kamei, J. (2011) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.005 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolavennu, V., Zeng, L., Peng, H., Wang, Y., & Danesh, F. R.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 714-723
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2170449776
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.