Cited by 61Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genetic Variation at the FTO Locus Influences RBL2 Gene Expression

Open access
Jowett, Jeremy B.M., Curran, Joanne E., Johnson, Matthew P., Carless, Melanie A., Göring, Harald H.H., Dyer, Thomas D., Cole, Shelley A., Comuzzie, Anthony G. +3 more·2010·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Genome-wide association studies that compare the statistical association between thousands of DNA variations and a human trait have detected 958 loci across 127 different diseases and traits. However, these statistical associations only provide evidence for genomic regions likely to harbor a causal gene(s) and do not directly identify such genes. We combined gene variation and expression data in a human cohort to identify causal genes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Global gene transcription activity was obtained for each individual in a large human cohort (n = 1,240). These quantitative transcript data were tested for correlation with genotype data generated from the same individuals to identify gene expression patterns influenced by the variants. RESULTS: Variant rs8050136 lies within intron 1 of the FTO gene on chromosome 16 and marks a locus strongly associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity and widely replicated across many populations. We report that genetic variation at this locus does not influence FTO gene expression levels (P = 0.38), but is strongly correlated with expression of RBL2 (P = 2.7 x 10(-5)), approximately 270,000 base pairs distant to FTO. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that variants at FTO influence RBL2 gene expression at large genetic distances. This observation underscores the complexity of human transcriptional regulation and highlights the utility of large human cohorts in which both genetic variation and global gene expression data are available to identify disease genes. Expedient identification of genes mediating the effects of genome-wide association study-identified loci will enable mechanism-of-action studies and accelerate understanding of human disease processes under genetic influence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db09-1277

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regulatory elements can act on downstream target genes located a long distance away and have diverse effects depending on the context in which they are activated, making the specific genes impacted by GWAS SNPs difficult to identify.

    “However, regulatory elements can act on downstream target genes located a long distance away and have diverse effects depending on the context in which they are activated [169], making the specific genes impacted by GWAS SNPs difficult to identify.”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [169]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 61

Authors
Jowett, J. B. M., Curran, J. E., Johnson, M. P., Carless, M. A., Göring, H. H. H., Dyer, T. D., Cole, S. A., Comuzzie, A. G., MacCluer, J. W., Moses, E. K., & Blangero, J.
Affiliations
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Texas Biomedical Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Jowett, Jeremy B.M.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2009-12-15
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
726-732
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2122890867
Cited by
61
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1c06rr013556-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL045222)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-059490, R37MH059490, R01MH059490)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06 RR-013556, RR013556)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
FTO, rs8050136, genetic variation, gene expression, type 2 diabetes, obesity, transcriptional regulation, causal gene identification, long-range gene regulation, intronic variants, genome-wide association study loci
MeSH terms
Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTO, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genotype, Humans, Introns, Genetic Linkage, Obesity, Proteins, Genetic Variation, Mexican Americans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Retinoblastoma-Like Protein p130, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review