Glucagonostatic potency of GLP-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes, patients with type 1 diabetes, and healthy control subjects
Abstract
Hyperglucagonemia is a well-known contributor to diabetic hyperglycemia, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) suppresses glucagon secretion. Reduced inhibitory effects of glucose and GLP-1 on glucagon secretion may contribute to the hyperglucagonemia in diabetes and influence the success of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy. We examined the dose-response relationship for GLP-1 on glucose-induced glucagon suppression in healthy individuals and patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes. In randomized order, 10 healthy individuals with normal glucose tolerance, 10 patients with type 2 diabetes, and 9 C-peptide-negative patients with type 1 diabetes underwent 4 separate stepwise glucose clamps (five 30-min steps from fasting level to 15 mmol/L plasma glucose) during simultaneous intravenous infusions of saline or 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 pmol GLP-1/kg/min. In healthy individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 potentiated the glucagon-suppressive effect of intravenous glucose in a dose-dependent manner. In patients with type 1 diabetes, no significant changes in glucagon secretion were observed during the clamps whether with saline or GLP-1 infusions. In conclusion, the glucagonostatic potency of GLP-1 during a stepwise glucose clamp is preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas our patients with type 1 diabetes were insensitive to the glucagonostatic effects of both glucose and GLP-1.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GLP-1's effects to suppress glucagon could be contributing to the observed glucagon suppression directly, and both GIP and GLP-1 could be contributing to suppression indirectly via improved insulin secretion responses.
“GLP-1 ' s effects to suppress glucagon could be contributing to the observed glucagon suppression directly (29), and both GIP and GLP-1 could be contributing to suppression indirectly via improved insulin secretion re sponses.”
From Effects of Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide on β-Cell Function, Insulin Sensitivity, and Glucose Control During a Meal Test (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Bagger, J. I., Grøndahl, M. F. G., Lund, A., Holst, J. J., Vilsbøll, T., & Knop, F. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bagger, Jonatan I.
- Knop, Filip K.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1347-1356
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W3136270702
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon secretion, hyperglucagonemia, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, glucose clamp, GLP-1 receptor agonists, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Fasting, Female, Glucagon, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Glucose Clamp Technique, Treatment Outcome, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Healthy Volunteers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review