Cited by 1Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

1392-P: Assisted Reproduction Technology Treatment and Risk of Gestational Diabetes

BIANCHI, CRISTINA, PELLE, CHIARA DELLA, GENNARO, GIOVANNI DE, ARAGONA, MICHELE, CELA, VITO, DELPRATO, STEFANO, BERTOLOTTO, ALESSANDRA·2020·Diabetes

Abstract

Assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment has been suggested to increase the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM), though the nature of this association remains unclear. In the attempt to gain more insight in such an association we have carried out a study to evaluate whether ART represents an independent risk factor for GDM in single pregnancies. We collected retrospectively clinical and anthropometric data of 221 ART- and 256 age and BMI matched women with natural conception (NC) screened for GDM between 2011-2019. Out of 477 women, 32 were excluded from the analysis due to multiple pregnancies (PMA: 24; CN: 8). Between the two groups there were no differences in age (ART: 39 ± 5; NC: 38 ± 3 years; ns), BMI (ART: 23.6 ± 4.4; NC: 22.9 ± 3.6 Kg/m2; ns) and family history of diabetes (ART: 31.4%; NC: 24.2%; ns). ART-women were more frequently primiparous (62.6% vs. 22.6%; p<0.0001), while a higher prevalence of previous GDM was observed among NC-women (9.7% vs. 2.6%; p=0.002). The prevalence of GDM in the whole cohort was 36.1% and was significantly higher in women with ART (52.3% vs. 23.4%; p <0.0001). In the whole cohort, risk factors for GDM were: age (OR 1.07 95% CI 1.02-1.13), first degree family history of diabetes (OR 2.02 95% CI 1.31-3.10), previous GDM (OR 2.09 95% CI 1.39- 3.14), pre-pregnancy obesity (OR 3.28; 95% CI 1.57-6.86) and ART (OR 3.59; 95% CI: 2.39 - 5.39). On multivariate analysis, family history of diabetes (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.03-2.69), previous GDM (OR 7.05; 95% CI: 2.92-17.04); pre-pregnancy obesity (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.21-6.13) and ART (OR 4.14; 95% CI 2.65-6.48) were independent risk factors for GDM . Among women requesting ART treatment, at least one in two develops GDM, and ART appears to be an independent risk factors for GDM. Disclosure: C. Bianchi: None. C. Della Pelle: None. G. de Gennaro: None. M. Aragona: None. V. Cela: None. S. DelPrato: None. A. Bertolotto: None.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db20-1392-p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 50% increase in the incidence of GDM in pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization was described.

    “Moreover, a 50% increase in the incidence of GDM in pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization was described [24].”

    From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [24]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BIANCHI, C., PELLE, C. D., GENNARO, G. D., ARAGONA, M., CELA, V., DELPRATO, S., & BERTOLOTTO, A.
Affiliations
Pisa, Italy
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W3035416851
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
assisted reproduction, gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy, risk factors, family history of diabetes, previous gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy obesity, primiparity, spontaneous conception, pregnancy outcomes, preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal jaundice, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, neonatal intensive care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review