Cited by 2Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

20-OR: digital twin (DT) technology in type 2 diabetes remission and glycemic improvement—Eighteen months results from a randomized controlled trial

SHAMANNA, PARAMESH, DHARMALINGAM, MALA, VADAVI, ARUN, KESHAVAMURTHY, ASHOK, BHONSLEY, SUCHITRA, THAJUDEEN, MOHAMED, SHA, ASMIN, JOSHI, SHASHANK R.·2024·Diabetes

Abstract

This study assesses the impact of Digital Twin (DT) technology, utilizing AI for postprandial glucose prediction, on T2D remission. Of the 233 participants using DT, 18 months' results were available for 218, showing significant improvements. Key metrics included reductions in HbA1c levels, body weight, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2B. The mean age and duration of diabetes were 44 years (±8.6) and 3.7 years (±2.7), respectively. Notable changes from baseline to eighteen months in these 218 participants included HbA1c (from 8.9 ± 1.9, 95% CI 8.7-9.2 to 6.4 ± 0.9, 95% CI 6.3-6.5), body weight (from 78.1 kg ± 14.3 to 72.8 kg ± 13.7), BMI (from 27.2 ± 4.3 to 25.2 ± 4.1), waist circumference (from 97.4 cm ± 11 to 88.1 cm ± 10.5), HOMA2-IR (from 1.9 ± 0.9 to 1.5 ± 0.8), and HOMA2B (from 51.9 ± 30.8 to 70.9 ± 32.9). Remission was defined as A1C levels less than 6.5% without medication for over 3 months. Out of the initial 233 DT participants, 207 completed a minimum of six months of the intervention, qualifying them for remission evaluation. Of these, 64.3% (133/207) achieved sustained remission at eighteen months. The standard care participants showed minimal HbA1c change (from 8.5 ± 1.8 to 8.3 ± 1.6). These findings underscore the potential of DT as a transformative tool in diabetes management, with significant correlations observed between reductions in A1c, body weight, and HOMA2B. Disclosure: P. Shamanna: None. M. Dharmalingam: None. A. Vadavi: None. A. Keshavamurthy: None. S. Bhonsley: None. M. Thajudeen: None. A. Sha: None. S.R. Joshi: Consultant; Twin Health, Marico, Franco Indian, Zydus Cadila, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals. Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, MSD, Abbott Nutrition, Abbott, Biocon, Alkem, USV Private Limited, Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db24-20-or

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Authors
SHAMANNA, P., DHARMALINGAM, M., VADAVI, A., KESHAVAMURTHY, A., BHONSLEY, S., THAJUDEEN, M., SHA, A., & JOSHI, S. R.
Affiliations
Bangalore, India, Mumbai, India
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2024-06-14
Volume
73
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399690461
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
digital twin, type 2 diabetes remission, glycemic control, artificial intelligence, HbA1c, weight loss, insulin resistance, HOMA2-IR, diabetes management, weight loss interventions, waist circumference, body mass index, long-term follow-up, sustained remission, standard of care comparison, type 2 diabetes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review