Cited by 4Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

223-OR: Emulation of the Study of Tirzepatide Compared with Dulaglutide on Major Cardiovascular Events in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes (SURPASS-CVOT)

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: SURPASS-CVOT is an ongoing, randomized, active-controlled trial evaluating the effect of tirzepatide vs. dulaglutide on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to emulate the SURPASS-CVOT trial using insurance claims data. Methods: Using claims from a private health plan (06/2022 to 08/2024), we identified 15,775 pairs of 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matched adults initiating tirzepatide or dulaglutide, stratified by baseline SGLT2i use. Our primary outcome was MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, or mortality). We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for 125 covariates. We also conducted HbA1c-adjusted analyses among those with HbA1c values (54% of population). Results: Over a median follow up of ~6 months, tirzepatide was associated with a 37% reduction in MACE vs. dulaglutide (Table). Results were consistent in the HbA1c-adjusted analysis (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95) and, in both analyses, irrespective of SGLT2i use. Conclusion: In this observational study emulating SURPASS-CVOT, tirzepatide appeared superior to dulaglutide in preventing MACE events. This study may also inform the design and conduct of future observational studies evaluating GLP-1-based treatments. Disclosure: J. Ostrominski: None. J. Ortega-Montiel: None. H. Tesfaye: None. C. Alix: None. D.J. Wexler: Other Relationship; Novo Nordisk. J.M. Paik: None. E. Patorno: Research Support; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Boehringer-Ingelheim. Other Relationship; UpToDate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db25-223-or

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
OSTROMINSKI, J., ORTEGA-MONTIEL, J., TESFAYE, H., ALIX, C., WEXLER, D. J., PAIK, J. M., & PATORNO, E.
Affiliations
Boston, MA
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2025-06-20
Volume
74
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411292316
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
tirzepatide, dulaglutide, type 2 diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, HbA1c, health insurance claims, propensity score matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review