Dietary Fiber Intake, Dietary Glycemic Load, and the Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—We aimed to examine whether pregravid dietary fiber consumptions from cereal, fruit, and vegetable sources and dietary glycemic load were related to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This study was a prospective cohort study among 13,110 eligible women in the Nurses’ Health Study II. GDM was self-reported and validated by medical record review in a subsample. RESULTS—We documented 758 incident GDM cases during 8 years of follow-up. After adjustment for age, parity, prepregnancy BMI, and other covariates, dietary total fiber and cereal and fruit fiber were strongly associated with GDM risk. Each 10-g/day increment in total fiber intake was associated with 26% (95% CI 9–49) reduction in risk; each 5-g/day increment in cereal or fruit fiber was associated with a 23% (9–36) or 26% (5–42) reduction, respectively. Dietary glycemic load was positively related to GDM risk. Multivariate relative risk for highest versus lowest quintiles was 1.61 (1.02–2.53) (P for trend 0.03). The combination of high–glycemic load and low–cereal fiber diet was associated with 2.15-fold (1.04–4.29) increased risk compared with the reciprocal diet. CONCLUSIONS—These findings suggested that prepregnancy diet might be associated with women’s GDM risk. In particular, diet with low fiber and high glycemic load was associated with an increased risk. Future clinical and metabolic studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diets high in fiber, micronutrients, and polyunsaturated fats are associated with a reduced risk of GDM.
“while diets high in fiber, micronutrients, and polyunsaturated fats are consistently associated with a reduced risk of GDM [38,39,40].”
From The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 378
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Liu, S., Solomon, C. G., & Hu, F. B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2006-10-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2223-2230
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2062641478
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (DK58845)
- National Cancer Institute (CA50385, R01CA050385)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058845, DK58845)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, dietary fiber, glycemic load, cereal fiber, fruit fiber, plant fibers, Nurses' Health Study II, diabetes risk
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Edible Grain, Dietary Fiber, Female, Fruit, Humans, Magnesium, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Risk, Vegetables, Cohort Studies, Diabetes, Gestational, Glycemic Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review