Changes in the glycemic profiles of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during pregnancy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the changes in glycemic excursions that occur during pregnancy using continuous glucose monitoring and to compare patterns of glycemia in pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational data analysis was performed from a prospective randomized study of continuous glucose monitoring in 57 women with pregestational type 1 (n = 40) or type 2 (n = 17) diabetes with 7-day continuous glucose monitoring system profiles during each trimester. Serial glucose measurements were divided into periods of euglycemia (70-140 mg/dl), hyperglycemia (>140 mg/dl), and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl). Generalized linear mixed effects models were fitted to the repeated measures data to determine how these glycemic characteristics varied during gestation and by diabetes type. RESULTS: A total of 180 continuous glucose profiles were examined (140 type 1 diabetes, 40 type 2 diabetes), providing 20,433 h of data for analysis (16,117 h type 1 diabetes, 4,316 type 2 diabetes). Women with type 2 diabetes spend approximately 33% less time hyperglycemic throughout pregnancy than women with type 1 diabetes (P = 0.005), with a significantly more rapid reduction in time spent hyperglycemic in early pregnancy (P = 0.02). Although women with type 2 diabetes spend less overall time hypoglycemic (P = 0.04), their risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia is equivalent to that of women with type 1 diabetes (blood glucose level <70 mg/dl, P = 0.9; blood glucose level <50 mg/dl, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous glucose monitoring reveals clear differences in the level of glycemic control that exist in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. These data will guide therapeutic interventions aimed at optimizing glycemic control and improving the pregnancy outcomes of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older and/or high-risk individuals with diabetes are at elevated risk for hypoglycemia.
“Although there is no evidence regarding time in range for older and/or high-risk individuals, numerous studies have shown the elevated risk for hypoglycemia in these populations (54-59).”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
Older and/or high-risk individuals with diabetes are at notably higher risk for severe hypoglycemia due to age, duration of diabetes, duration of insulin therapy, and greater prevalence of hypoglycemia unawareness.
“Older and/or high-risk individuals with diabetes are at notably higher risk for severe hypoglycemia due to age, duration of diabetes, duration of insulin therapy, and greater prevalence of hypoglycemia unawareness (54-58).”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Murphy, H. R., Rayman, G., Duffield, K., Lewis, K. S., Kelly, S., Johal, B., Fowler, D., & Temple, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Ipswich Hospital (GB)
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2785-2791
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2117170302
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, pregnancy, glycemic control, continuous glucose monitoring, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, nocturnal hypoglycemia, pregestational diabetes, glycemic excursions, pregnancy trimesters
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Monitoring, Physiologic, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prospective Studies, Glucose Clamp Technique, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review