Cited by 114Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Simvastatin improves flow-mediated dilation but reduces adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients

Open access
Koh, Kwang Kon, Quon, Michael J., Han, Seung Hwan, Lee, Yonghee, Ahn, Jeong Yeal, Kim, Soo Jin, Koh, Yesl, Shin, Eak Kyun·2008·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that simvastatin may reduce adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, sex, and BMI were matched. Thirty-two patients were given placebo, and 30, 32, 31, and 31 patients were given daily 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg simvastatin, respectively, during a 2-month treatment period. RESULTS: Simvastatin doses of 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg significantly reduced total cholesterol (mean changes 27, 25, 37, and 38%), LDL cholesterol (39, 38, 52, and 54%), and apolipoprotein B levels (24, 30, 36, and 42%) and improved flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (68, 40, 49, and 63%) after 2 months of therapy compared with baseline (P < 0.001 by paired t test) or compared with placebo (P < 0.001 by ANOVA). Simvastatin doses of 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg significantly decreased plasma adiponectin levels (4, 12, 5, and 10%) and insulin sensitivity (determined by the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index [QUICKI]) (5, 8, 6, and 6%) compared with baseline (P < 0.05 by paired t test) or compared with placebo (P = 0.011 for adiponectin and P = 0.034 for QUICKI by ANOVA). However, the magnitudes of these percent changes (FMD, adiponectin, and QUICKI) were not significantly different among four different doses of simvastatin despite dose-dependent changes in the reduction of apolipoprotein B levels. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin significantly improved endothelium-dependent dilation, but reduced adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients independent of dose and the extent of apolipoprotein B reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc07-2199

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies by Koh et al. used the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index as a surrogate measure for insulin sensitivity, while Ohrvall et al. used the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique.

    “The 3 studies by Koh et al. (19,20,22) from 2008, 2009, and 2010 used the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index as a surrogate measure for insulin sensitivity, whereas the study by Ohrvall et al. (21) from 1995 used the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique.”

    From Simvastatin Effects on Skeletal Muscle (2013) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Statin treatment has been reported to impair insulin sensitivity and increase type 2 diabetes prevalence, with lipophilic statins having a stronger effect than hydrophilic statins.

    “Recently, it has been reported that statin treatment impairs insulin sensitivity and increases the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (19 -22); and it seems that lipophilic statins (i.e., simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin) have a more pronounced effect on insulin sensitivity compared with hydrophilic statins (i.e., pravastatin, rosuvastatin) (23).”

    From Simvastatin Effects on Skeletal Muscle (2013) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 114

Authors
Koh, K. K., Quon, M. J., Han, S. H., Lee, Y., Ahn, J. Y., Kim, S. J., Koh, Y., & Shin, E. K.
Affiliations
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
776-782
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2164781406
Cited by
114
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Z01AT000001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
simvastatin, flow-mediated dilation, adiponectin, insulin sensitivity, hypercholesterolemia, endothelial function, apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, dose dependence, statins, QUICKI
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins B, Blood Flow Velocity, C-Reactive Protein, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Insulin Resistance, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Placebos, Vasodilation, Body Mass Index, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Adiponectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review