Cited by 996Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

New Users of Metformin Are at Low Risk of Incident Cancer

Open access
Libby, Gillian, Donnelly, Louise A., Donnan, Peter T., Alessi, Dario R., Morris, Andrew D., Evans, Josie M.M.·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The antidiabetic properties of metformin are mediated through its ability to activate the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Activation of AMPK can suppress tumor formation and inhibit cell growth in addition to lowering blood glucose levels. We tested the hypothesis that metformin reduces the risk of cancer in people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In an observational cohort study using record-linkage databases and based in Tayside, Scotland, U.K., we identified people with type 2 diabetes who were new users of metformin in 1994–2003. We also identified a set of diabetic comparators, individually matched to the metformin users by year of diabetes diagnosis, who had never used metformin. In a survival analysis we calculated hazard ratios for diagnosis of cancer, adjusted for baseline characteristics of the two groups using Cox regression. RESULTS: Cancer was diagnosed among 7.3% of 4,085 metformin users compared with 11.6% of 4,085 comparators, with median times to cancer of 3.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (P < 0.001). The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for cancer was 0.46 (0.40–0.53). After adjusting for sex, age, BMI, A1C, deprivation, smoking, and other drug use, there was still a significantly reduced risk of cancer associated with metformin: 0.63 (0.53–0.75). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that metformin use may be associated with a reduced risk of cancer. A randomized trial is needed to assess whether metformin is protective in a population at high risk for cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc08-2175

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use.

    “In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use [137].”
  • The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in studies of metformin users has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30%.

    “The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135-139,145-147].”
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.

    “Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.”
  • A cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients newly treated with metformin found that the frequency of cancer was significantly lower in patients receiving metformin than in the controls who had never received metformin, after adjusting for body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, smoking and the use of other drugs.

    “A cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients newly treated with metformin later followed in which the frequency of cancer was significantly lower in patients receiving metformin than in the controls who had never received metformin, after adjusting for body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, smoking and the use of other drugs (254)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 996

Authors
Libby, G., Donnelly, L. A., Donnan, P. T., Alessi, D. R., Morris, A. D., & Evans, J. M. M.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, Josie M.M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-06-29
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1620-1625
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2085331940
Cited by
996
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 92
FWCI
32.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Tenovus
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
metformin, type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, AMPK, antidiabetic drugs, cancer prevention, drug safety, new users
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review