New Users of Metformin Are at Low Risk of Incident Cancer
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The antidiabetic properties of metformin are mediated through its ability to activate the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Activation of AMPK can suppress tumor formation and inhibit cell growth in addition to lowering blood glucose levels. We tested the hypothesis that metformin reduces the risk of cancer in people with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In an observational cohort study using record-linkage databases and based in Tayside, Scotland, U.K., we identified people with type 2 diabetes who were new users of metformin in 1994–2003. We also identified a set of diabetic comparators, individually matched to the metformin users by year of diabetes diagnosis, who had never used metformin. In a survival analysis we calculated hazard ratios for diagnosis of cancer, adjusted for baseline characteristics of the two groups using Cox regression. RESULTS: Cancer was diagnosed among 7.3% of 4,085 metformin users compared with 11.6% of 4,085 comparators, with median times to cancer of 3.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (P < 0.001). The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for cancer was 0.46 (0.40–0.53). After adjusting for sex, age, BMI, A1C, deprivation, smoking, and other drug use, there was still a significantly reduced risk of cancer associated with metformin: 0.63 (0.53–0.75). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that metformin use may be associated with a reduced risk of cancer. A randomized trial is needed to assess whether metformin is protective in a population at high risk for cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use.
“In an observational study of women with type 2 diabetes, a decreased risk of breast cancer among metformin users was only seen with long-term use [137].”
From Metformin: An Old But Still the Best Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [137]
The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in studies of metformin users has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30%.
“The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135-139,145-147].”
From Metformin: An Old But Still the Best Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [137]
Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.
“Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.”
From Metformin: An Old But Still the Best Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [137]
A cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients newly treated with metformin found that the frequency of cancer was significantly lower in patients receiving metformin than in the controls who had never received metformin, after adjusting for body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, smoking and the use of other drugs.
“A cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients newly treated with metformin later followed in which the frequency of cancer was significantly lower in patients receiving metformin than in the controls who had never received metformin, after adjusting for body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, smoking and the use of other drugs (254)”
From Metformin, the Aspirin of the 21st Century: Its Role in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Prevention of Preeclampsia and Cancer, and the Promotion of Longevity (2017) · cites this paper as [254]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 996
- Authors
- Libby, G., Donnelly, L. A., Donnan, P. T., Alessi, D. R., Morris, A. D., & Evans, J. M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, Josie M.M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-06-29
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1620-1625
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC2732153
- OpenAlex
- W2085331940
- Cited by
- 996
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 92
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- Tenovus
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Keywords
- metformin, type 2 diabetes, cancer risk, AMPK, antidiabetic drugs, cancer prevention, drug safety, new users
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review