The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence and Management of Diabetes in Korean Adults
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: This research investigated recent changes in the prevalence and management status of diabetes among Korean adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a nationwide survey examining the general health and nutrition status of the Korean people, was conducted in 1998, 2001, and 2005. Using the first (1998; n = 5,645), second (2001; n = 4,154), and third (2005; n = 4,628) KNHANES datasets, in the present study, we estimated the prevalence of diabetes among Korean adults (aged ≥30 years), the proportions of known cases of diabetes, and the proportions of well-controlled cases of diabetes, as defined by either the American Diabetes Association (A1C <7%) or the International Diabetes Federation guidelines (A1C <6.5%). RESULTS: In 2005, the prevalence of diabetes was estimated to be 9.1% (∼2.58 million people: 10.2% of men and 7.9% of women), including 6.2% with known diabetes and 2.9% with newly diagnosed diabetes. The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose was 17.4% (∼4.94 million people). The proportion of known cases of diabetes drastically increased from 23.2% in 1998 to 41.2% in 2001 and 68.0% in 2005 (P < 0.0001). Among known diabetic patients in 2005, 43.5 and 22.9% had A1C levels <7.0 and <6.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of diabetes in Korea has not changed significantly between 1998 and 2005. Physician diagnosis and treatment rates of diabetes have significantly improved during this period, but glycemic control was still poorer than that in other developed countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood
Chan, A. Y., Swaminathan, R., & Cockram, C. S. (1989) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/35.2.315 · Cited by 289
M. Stahl, L. G. M. J. (2001) · Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1080/003655101300133612 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035
Guariguata, L., Whiting, D. R., Hambleton, I., Beagley, J., Linnenkamp, U., & Shaw, J. E. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002 · Cited by 4,642
Gender aspects in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic risk
Sattar, N. (2013) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.006 · Cited by 177
Koo, B. K., Roh, E., Yang, Y. S., & Moon, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.12392 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, Y. J., Kim, H. C., Kim, H. M., Park, S. W., Kim, J., & Kim, D. J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-08-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2016-2020
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2053413572
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Management of Diabetes in Korean Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc08-2228
- The paper
- Choi, Y. J., Kim, H. C., Kim, H. M., Park, S. W., Kim, J., & Kim, D. J. (2009). Prevalence and Management of Diabetes in Korean Adults. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-2228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.