The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impact of a Natural Disaster on Diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of Hurricane Katrina on the health of individuals with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational study in 1,795 adults with an A1C measurement 6 months before and 6−16 months after Hurricane Katrina in three health care systems: private (Tulane University Hospital and Clinic [TUHC]), state (Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans [MCLNO]), and Veterans Affairs (VA). Glycemic control (A1C), blood pressure, and lipids before the hurricane were compared with the patients' first measurement thereafter. The CORE Diabetes Model was used to project life expectancy and health economic impact. RESULTS: Mean predisaster A1C levels differed between MCLNO and VA patients (mean 7.7 vs. 7.3%, P < 0.001) and increased significantly among MCLNO patients to 8.3% (P < 0.001) but not among VA and TUHC patients. Mean systolic blood pressure increased in all three systems (130–137.6 mmHg for TUHC and 130.7–143.7 for VA, P < 0.001; 132–136 for MCLNO, P = 0.008). Mean LDL cholesterol increased in the VA (97.1–104.3 mg/dl) and TUHC patients (103.4–115.5; P < 0.001). Hurricane Katrina increased modeled direct, indirect, and total health care costs and also reduced life expectancy as well as quality-adjusted life expectancy, with the economic impact being quite substantial because of the large population size affected. We estimate a lifetime cost of USD $504 million for the adult population affected, with the largest economic impact seen among MCLNO patients. CONCLUSIONS: A major disaster had a significant effect on diabetes management and exacerbated existing disparities. These effects may have a lasting impact on both health and economic implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Satoh, H., Ohira, T., Hosoya, M., Sakai, A., Watanabe, T., Ohtsuru, A., Kawasaki, Y., Suzuki, H., Takahashi, A., Kobashi, G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Research · doi:10.1155/2015/415253 · Cited by 302
Eberle, C., & Stichling, S. (2021) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-021-00705-9 · Cited by 181
COVID-19 in people living with diabetes: An international consensus
Caballero, A. E., Ceriello, A., Misra, A., Aschner, P., McDonnell, M. E., Hassanein, M., Ji, L., Mbanya, J. C., & Fonseca, V. A. (2020) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107671 · Cited by 132
Self-citationPerspectives on the health effects of hurricanes: a review and challenges
Waddell, S. L., Jayaweera, D. T., Mirsaeidi, M., Beier, J. C., & Kumar, N. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18052756 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Fonseca, V. A., Smith, H., Kuhadiya, N., Leger, S. M., Yau, C. L., Reynolds, K., Shi, L., McDuffie, R. H., Thethi, T., & John-Kalarickal, J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-06-19
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1632-1638
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2143838667
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of a Natural Disaster on Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc09-0670
- The paper
- Fonseca, V. A., Smith, H., Kuhadiya, N., Leger, S. M., Yau, C. L., Reynolds, K., Shi, L., McDuffie, R. H., Thethi, T., & John-Kalarickal, J. (2009). Impact of a Natural Disaster on Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0670
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.